CLASHING DIALECTICS OF VICTIMHOOD IN IRAQ WAR NARRATIVES: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH

Abstract

This dissertation examines the contrasting representations of victimhood in Iraq War narratives, focusing on the discord between official accounts and grassroots testimonies regarding the experiences of those affected by the conflict. Through a qualitative analysis of interviews, media sources, and personal narratives, the study highlights significant discrepancies in how different stakeholders articulate their suffering, revealing that official narratives often obscure grassroots perspectives that capture the complexities of personal trauma. The findings indicate that these divergent portrayals not only shape public perception but also influence policy approaches related to healthcare for war victims. By illuminating the nuanced realities of victimhood, this research underscores the importance of integrating diverse narratives in addressing the psychological and physical health needs of affected populations. The implications of this study extend to the field of healthcare, suggesting that a more inclusive understanding of victimhood can enhance the design and implementation of targeted interventions, ultimately fostering more empathetic and effective healthcare responses to the repercussions of war. This work contributes to the critical discourse on narrative representation and its impact on societal and institutional frameworks, thereby advocating for a multidisciplinary approach in addressing the healthcare needs of those traumatized by conflict.