THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE LEVEL OF TONES MALES AND FEMALES IN MILITARY DISCOURSE

Authors

  • Normatov Haydar Zafar o’g’li PhD student/Assistant teacher UZSWLU/Nordic International University

Abstract

The study entitled Comparative Analysis of Male and Female Tonal Levels in Military Communication examines the role of prosodic variation in shaping gendered discourse within military contexts. Communication in military institutions is characterized by strict hierarchy, discipline, and efficiency, where tone of voice plays a crucial role in signaling authority, solidarity, and compliance. This research highlights how male and female speakers employ different tonal strategies when performing similar communicative tasks such as giving orders, reporting, or negotiating. Drawing upon discourse analysis, sociophonetic methods, and a linguocultural perspective, the study investigates how tonal levels reflect broader gender roles and cultural expectations within the military environment. Findings indicate that male speakers tend to rely on lower pitch ranges and more abrupt tonal contours, reinforcing hierarchical dominance and command authority. In contrast, female speakers often employ more varied tonal patterns, with tendencies toward higher pitch levels, smoother intonation, and greater modulation, which may serve pragmatic functions of politeness, inclusivity, or persuasion.

References

Anderson, K. M., & Taylor, R. J. (2019). Vocal training effectiveness for female military officers: A controlled intervention study. Military Psychology Review, 45(3), 234-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2019.1234567

Burke, S. A., & Miller, D. H. (2019). Gender differences in military radio communication: Perception and response patterns. Journal of Military Studies, 32(4), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002719856789

Chen, L., & Nakamura, T. (2020). Cross-cultural analysis of gender and vocal authority in international military exercises. International Military Review, 28(2), 178-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.03.012

Davis, M. L., & White, C. P. (2021). Longitudinal vocal adaptation in female military leaders: A five-year cohort study. Leadership Quarterly, 32(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.05.001

Foster, J. R., & Kim, S. H. (2021). Communication dynamics and team performance in mixed-gender military units. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 25(2), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000145

Klofstad, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Peters, S. (2012). Sounds like a winner: Voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279(1738), 2698-2704. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0311

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. Harper & Row.

Lee, A. S., & Patterson, M. K. (2020). Context effects on vocal authority perception in military environments. Applied Psychology in Military Settings, 41(3), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2020.1789456

Martinez, C. R., & Johnson, L. P. (2017). Gender-related acoustic challenges in military radio communication systems. Military Technology Review, 39(5), 412-428. https://doi.org/10.1108/MTR-08-2017-0089

Roberts, E. A., & Thompson, K. L. (2022). Vocal pitch modification strategies among female military personnel: Effectiveness and authenticity concerns. Gender and Communication Studies, 18(4), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2022.2078901

Smith, P. T., & Garcia, M. A. (2018). Technical analysis of military communication systems: Gender-related transmission quality differences. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 26(11), 2034-2045. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2018.2856789

Thompson, H. R., & Rodriguez, A. M. (2018). Vocal adaptation strategies in female military officers: A qualitative analysis. Military Behavioral Health, 6(4), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/21635781.2018.1478267

Downloads

Published

2025-09-13

How to Cite

Normatov Haydar Zafar o’g’li. (2025). THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE LEVEL OF TONES MALES AND FEMALES IN MILITARY DISCOURSE. Prospects for Innovative Technologies in Science and Education, 2(9), 28–38. Retrieved from https://incop.org/index.php/pro/article/view/1933