ROBOTIC SURGERY: OPPORTUNITIES AND PROSPECTS
Abstract
This article explores the development, clinical applications, and future prospects of robotic surgery as an innovative approach in modern surgical practice. The study analyzes the technological foundations of robotic-assisted systems, including enhanced three-dimensional visualization, articulated instruments, tremor filtration, and ergonomic advantages for surgeons. Particular attention is given to the expanding role of robotic surgery in various specialties such as urology, general surgery, oncology, gynecology, and thoracic procedures. The paper evaluates the clinical benefits of robotic techniques, including reduced intraoperative blood loss, minimized tissue trauma, shorter hospital stays, and improved functional outcomes. In addition, the article examines economic, educational, and ethical considerations associated with the implementation of robotic platforms in healthcare institutions. Challenges such as high costs, the need for specialized training, and the learning curve are discussed alongside the growing integration of artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and tele-surgical technologies. The findings suggest that robotic surgery represents a transformative advancement in minimally invasive medicine, with significant potential to enhance surgical precision, patient safety, and long-term clinical outcomes.
References
1. Lanfranco, A. R., Castellanos, A. E., Desai, J. P., & Meyers, W. C. (2004). Robotic surgery: A current perspective. Annals of Surgery, 239(1), 14–21.
2. Herron, D. M., & Marohn, M. (2008). A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 22(2), 313–325.
3. Intuitive Surgical. (2022). da Vinci Surgical System: Clinical overview and applications. Sunnyvale, CA.
4. Satava, R. M. (2002). Surgical robotics: The early chronicles. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 12(1), 6–16.
5. Patel, V. R., Sivaraman, A., Coelho, R. F., et al. (2011). Pentafecta: A new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. European Urology, 59(5), 702–707.
6. Anderson, C., & Kapp, D. S. (2018). Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Current applications and future directions. Gynecologic Oncology, 148(3), 573–582.
7. Spinoglio, G., Summa, M., Priora, F., & Quarati, R. (2017). Robotic colorectal surgery: Current evidence and future perspectives. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 23(17), 2957–2968.
8. Giulianotti, P. C., & Coratti, A. (2003). Robotics in general surgery: Personal experience in a large community hospital. Archives of Surgery, 138(7), 777–784.
9. Yang, Y., Wang, F., Zhang, P., & Shi, C. (2017). Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of short outcomes. PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0179889.
10. Marescaux, J., Leroy, J., Gagner, M., et al. (2001). Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature, 413(6854), 379–380.
